OK, when I arrived for my flight to Orlando this morning, I saw that the Full Body Scan (aka "Virtual Strip Search) has now apparently become the standard order of procedure for Richmond International Airport. They only have ONE backscatter scanner, but everybody is expected to go through it unless they protest. When I stepped up to the line, there was a lady patiently standing there. I asked her if she was being made to wait because she had "opted out" of the virtual strip search. She said, "Yes, I guess I have to wait because I have 'a choice'." She was a first class frequent traveler and had been waiting 10 minutes for the exercise of her freedoms. She was a bit frustrated, but was not going to be bullied into relinquishing her freedoms. She was adamant about that fact.
I had the time to talk to her because I was also opting to exercise my constitutional freedoms from illegal search and siezure. In fairness to TSA, I'll have to say that the guy who did my patdown was was sensitive to my rights. When he commented that I'd probably done this many times, I said, "No, I used to be able to be screened without having to opt out of a virtual strip search." He didn't react negatively to my comment and was quite professional in his conduct.
I told him that I was aware that he was just doing his job. He said, "Let's just get you through here." He scanned his gloves in advance to confirm that his gloves didn't create a "false positive" on the explosives test. I joked that if his gloves failed, I'd have to screen him. He didn't laugh out loud, but appreciated the humor. (Wow! That is a change from most of my previous interactions with TSA!)
I don't know if they've backed off on some of the "enhanced pat-down procedures" but the pat-down was not excessively invasive. I've seen others go through the enhanced pat-down before and I don't feel that this one was as invasive as some that I've seen. Maybe TSA is buckling a bit to our demands for our constitutional rights? :-) Read: http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-tsa-scanners-20110202,0,984304.story
I appreciate that TSA has some professional employees. I appreciate that they seem to have eased up some on the enhanced pat-down. However, none of this makes up for policies that play "fast-and-loose" with our constitutional rights to begin with. I still contend that everyone who walked through the strip-search line this morning were denied their Constitutional right to protection from illegal search and seizure without probable cause. The more we submit quietly to this erosion of our rights, the more the bureaucrats in charge of our "security" will sharpen their knives to whittle away yet more or our rights.
Sunday, February 6, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Now the airlines are maybe a tiny bit safer, but the determined terrorists will move on to "softer" targets, like Times Square, Xmas tree lighting ceremonies and cargo bombs.
Next attack - shopping centers, schools, cruise ships, sports events, subways, tunnels, buses, airport security lines to name but a few.
We cannot possibly catch every attempt by screening, but we can humiliate millions of people, violate their rights and their privacy, possibly cause cancers, and help bankrupt already hurting commercial aviation companies.
My answer: Get rid of 25,000-35,000 TSA clerks, dump the scanners and pat-downs, go back to WTMD's with scanners as OPTIONAL secondary screening, bring in dogs, and give the saved money to the FBI & CIA, who can actually catch terrorists (maybe).
My family and I won't fly until this travesty is lifted.
Post a Comment